Boeing B-314

The Boeing clipper is widely regarded at the summit of flying boat technology.  It inaugurated the world’s first transatlantic  heavier-than-air service, and carried passengers and cargo around the globe in the 1930’s and 1940’s.

Large, luxurious, and reliable — and with an astounding range of 3,500 statute miles — the B-314 made intercontinental passenger airline service a practical reality.

314-138-laguardia

Boeing B-314 "Dixie Clipper" (click photos to enlarge)

The development of the B-314

Early in 1936, Pan American solicited proposals for the next generation airliner for Atlantic service, and to stimulate interest among aircraft manufacturers, Pan Am offered a $50,000 cash prize for the winning design.

Sikorsky responded with a design that would eventually be developed as the S-44, which met Pan Am’s requirements for speed and range but was rejected because it carried too few passengers.   (Three S-44’s would later be used by American Export Airlines, which competed with Pan Am across the Atlantic from 1945-1950.)   Consolidated Aircraft proposed a four-engine ship based on its PB-Y Catalina flying boat (which would later gain fame as an anti-submarine and search-and-rescue aircraft during World War II), but the Consolidated design was also rejected as too small.

Martin, which made the M-130 China Clipper, proposed a model known as the M-156, but it was also rejected by Pam Am, leaving Glenn Martin furious; despite owing much of its success to the China Clipper. Pan Am had purchased only three of the M-130 aircraft.  Martin had taken a loss on such a small production run, which he expected to make up with future business for the airline.

The winner of Pan Am’s competition was the Boeing Aircraft Company of Seattle, Washington, which was initially reluctant even to submit a proposal.  But under the leadership of a relatively young engineer named Wellwood Beall, Boeing eventually constructed a ship widely recognized as the apex of flying boat design.

On June 31, 1936, Pan Am signed a contract for six of the Boeing 314 clippers, with an option for six more.

Boeing B-314 Passenger Accommodations

The B-314 could carry 74 passengers and 10 crew, although in overnight sleeper configuration, the ship accommodated 40 passengers in seven luxurious compartments, including a 14-seat dining room and a private “honeymoon suite” at the tail end of the plane.

B-314. Life Magazine, August 23, 1937.

B-314. Life Magazine, August 23, 1937.

B-214 Passenger Deck Plan (click to enlarge)

B-214 Passenger Deck Plan (click to enlarge)

B-314 "Honeymoon Suite"

B-314 "Honeymoon Suite"

B-314 Dining Room and Lounge

B-314 Dining Room and Lounge

Boeing 314 Dining Room

Boeing 314 Dining Room

Boeing B-314 Technical Details

A giant aircraft for its day, the B-314 weighed over 40 tons and had a wingspan 3/4 that of a Boeing 747-100.

  • Length: 106′
  • Wingspan: 152′
  • Max Gross Takeoff Weight:  82,500 lb B-314, 84,000 lb B-314A
  • Engines: Four Wright GR-2600 Twin Cyclone, 14 cylinder radial engines (1,500 hp B-314, 1,600 hp B-314A)
  • Propellers: Hamilton-Standard 3-blade, full-feathering constant speed (variable pitch), 14′ diameter
  • Fuel capacity: 4,246 gallons B-314, 5,446 B-314A
  • Crew:  10
  • Maximum  Speed:  199 mph
  • Cruising Speed:  183 mph
  • Service Ceiling: 13,400 ft B-314, 19,600 ft B-314A
  • Range: 3,500 miles B-314, 5,200 miles B-314A
B-314 wing catwalk, allowing access to the engines during flight.

B-314 wing catwalk, allowing access to the engines during flight.

Among the technical innovations pioneered by the B-314 were the fully-feathering propellers insisted upon by Pan Am Chief Engineer Andre Priester.   And important safety feature which would be incorporated in virtually all subsequent variable-pitch propellers, the full-feathering props also allowed mechanics to take advantage of the B-314’s unparalleled in-flight engine access made possible by the wing’s thick chord.  The 314’s wing was thick enough to allow access through a walkway to the engines in flight, where the fully-feathering props made it possible for a mechanic to perform repairs in flight.  Between June, 1939 and June, 1941, 431 in-flight engine repairs were performed by B-314 engineers.

Over the course of their careers, the B-314’s operated by Pan American made approximately 5,000 ocean crossings and flew more than 12.5 million miles, and each of Pan Am’s Boeing clippers accumulated mor ethan 18,000 flight hours.  During World War II alone, B-314’s carried more than 84,000 passengers, almost all of whom were on journeys of importance to the war effort.

b-314-160-web
Pan Am Yankee Clipper
b-314-163-web
Postcard of Boeing 314 Flight Deck
b-314-flight-deck
Flight deck of Boeing 314

The Boeing Clippers

Operated by Pan American Airways (PAA)

Model B-314

  • NC-18601 – Honolulu Clipper
  • NC-18602 – California Clipper (renamed Pacific Clipper for a few months in 1941)
  • NC-18603 – Yankee Clipper
  • NC-18604 – Atlantic Clipper
  • NC-18605 – Dixie Clipper
  • NC-18606 – American Clipper

Model B-314A

  • NC-18609 – Pacific Clipper (renamed California Clipper for a few months in 1941)
  • NC-18611 – Anzac Clipper
  • NC-18612 – Cape Town Clipper

Operated by British Overseas Airways Corporation (BOAC)

Model B-314A

  • NC-18607/G-AGBZ – Bristol
  • NC-18608/G-AGCA – Berwick
  • NC-18610/G-AGCB – Bangor

{ 11 comments… read them below or add one }

Jamie Dodson July 7, 2009 at 4:38 pm

If you’re ever in Ireland, you can see a full scale B-314 replica at the Foynes Flying Boat Museum, They have posted some pictures at this URL, http://flyingboatmuseum.smugmug.com/gallery/3400013#190139725_3TeGk.
Cheers! Jamie

[Reply]

Mike Brown July 8, 2009 at 10:22 am

I’m sure I’ve seen old footage of people going out on a “balcony” type arrangement on a flying boat to have a smoke. Can anyone help me out here?

Cheers

[Reply]

admin Reply:

None of the flying boats had an external balcony of any type, but you may be referring to the “promenade deck” on the C-Class Empire flying boats built by Short Brothers. Since you seem to be writing from Australia, here is an example from an old QANTAS advertisement (click to enlarge):

[Reply]

Mike Brown Reply:

I am indeed writing from Oz.
Thank you very much for that – very informative.

[Reply]

Jim Empson August 25, 2009 at 3:57 pm

As a boy in 1938, I went with my parents to the Solent uk area on holiday. A Pan Am “Clipper” arrived and, being “plane crazy” all my life – obtained the autographs of three crew members. They were Hugh H. Gordon, Elkins H. Hale and F.A.Humanson. Does anyone recognize these names? In the 1960’s, I gained my own flying licence and flew two of types of seaplanes. The fun was whilst on the water. Once airbourne, the ‘plane was just another aeroplane !

[Reply]

Hugh Armstrong Reply:

Hugh Gordon was my grandfather. Originally from Athens, GA, he received flight training in the U.S. Marines and was a pilot for Pan Am from the 1930’s until his retirement in the early ’70’s. He was captain aboard the Pan Am clipper “America” which flew the first round-the-world commercial flight.

[Reply]

Jim Empson, Ipswich, UK Reply:

Wonderful – what a boon home computers are !

[Reply]

Gerald Gibson September 6, 2009 at 12:01 pm

I worked for Pan Am from 1943 to 1950 and wonder if there is anyone out there who worked for
Pan Am during those years. I was a mechanic at LaGuardia from 1943 to 1948. Then I went to Africa at Leopoldville, Dakar & Liberia from 1948 to 1950.

w

[Reply]

Stefan A. Bailis, Psy.D. Reply:

Gerald,

Were you around the Marine Air Terminal during your time at LGA? Do you remember Pan Am’s competition, American Export Airlines? Did you see the VS-44s of American Export Airlines or meet any of their crewmembers? If so, I have a surprise for you!

Stef Bailis
Former F/O, F/E, on the DC-6, DC-7, Super Constellations, late 1970s-late 80s.
Aviation enthusiast all my life.

[Reply]

Catherine Soubzmaigne September 7, 2009 at 7:01 am

I just finished a novel by Ken Follet “Night over water” that takes place in a clipper and I was checking the websites about that seaplane (Boeing B-314). I just thought some of you might be interested.
It’s a novel but it really gives a good idea of what travels could be on board. And the writer was very well documented apparently (the plane is very important in the novel)
I have been a stewardess on Air France (1971-1975) and my husband was a captain on the same airline (1960-1992) and I am always very interested in aeronautics of all forms.

[Reply]

Roberto D'Antonio Reply:

I’m in the middle of the Ken Follet book now and I don’t want it to end.

[Reply]

Gerald Gibson September 8, 2009 at 12:32 pm

Dear Stefan,

Yes, I worked at Pan Am at the Marine base at La Guardia from the fall of 1943 to March of 1948 and I well remember American Export hanger right behind ours. I’m not sure that the planes I saw were VS-44s and I did not meet any of the crewmembers.

Gerald Gibson

[Reply]

joe j September 12, 2009 at 11:58 am

there was a sea plane whitch featured a smoking out door balcony…… but it was a fictionalized feature from a late 30’s movies called …..i think “18 hours by air”……………..see if you can look it up john loder…………………

[Reply]

joe j Reply:

Sorry about that …..john loder and anna lee stared in the picture ” nonstop new york”its a british film 1937 ………its pretty corny but it gives a good idea on what people were thinking about when and if people were expecting when crossing the atlantic by boat…………….see previous reply…..joe

[Reply]

Christopher O'Donnell October 3, 2009 at 10:09 pm

I was quite taken with the QANTAS poster above.
I saw many a flying boat leave Rose Bay in Sydney…great stuff to see them “bangin’ away” across Sydney Harbour if there was chop running…
See my site re BCPA pre QANTAS…no flying boats for them, alas !

[Reply]

Christopher O'Donnell October 3, 2009 at 10:10 pm

…oppppsss…I did not realize it would not show in the body of the comment…ssooooo…view if wish : flightoftheresolution.org

[Reply]

Bob Maynard November 25, 2009 at 7:22 pm

To: The guy above who went through Dakar while connected the Clippers: From 1944-1946 my father was an air traffic controller with the Army Air Corps at Dakar. Most of the stories he told were pretty funny, but one Did have an edge. The Clippers would land at Dakar. The Air Traffic Controllers used normal “telegraph keys”. The Clipper crews had a gadget called a “bug”. A button on one side of the Bug sent a dot and a button on the other side sent a dash. An experienced telegraph operator using a Bug could go faaast. One of the Pan-Am radio operators decided to be a smart-aleck and send as fast as he could. The Air Traffic Controllers couldn’t understand him and repeatedly asked him “repeat please”. They finally had enough and went downstairs to “Point-To-Point”. As in “Dakar-To-New York” or “Dakar-To-Boston”. Those guys sent LOTS of code every day and all had Bugs. The next time the smart aleck started his “hah hah hah, i’m so fast” routine he was answered by an operator brought up to the tower from Point-to-Point :-) HE was aking “repeat please”. Several times, before they let him off the hook. –Bob

[Reply]

Peter Hancock, PhD January 6, 2010 at 4:15 am

The Boeing Clippers were magnificent flying machines, which provided an excellent service, for the pre-jet era. But comparing the flight performance and carrying capacity with large modern passenger aircraft, such as the Boeing 747, in various configurations and modifications, the Clippers may be regarded as amongst the major pioneers of seaplane passenger operations.

Is it not clear that today there could be an opportunity for a new major seaplane, such as the
superb Saunders-Roe Princess, of 1952, whose wingspan of over 200 feet ( 60 metres) and range of 5000 nautical miles are still comparable with a Boeing 747 ?

The two chief problems of the SARO Princess were its limited carrying capacity of +/- 100
passengers, and turbo-prop engines (with contra-rotating props) and resultant lack of jet-age speeds
of say, Mach 0.82 (592 mph/515.53 knots). These problems might be resolved by installing modern, relatively lightweight jet engines, and lengthening the fuselage to increase the passenger and/or freight-carrying capacity.

Although the three Princess aircraft actually built were broken up in 1967, one of them had already successfully clocked up over 100 hours flying time, apparently with little trouble. One factor in the decision to abandon the project appears to have been that 1952 saw the inauguration of the first ever jet passenger aircraft service, with the commencement of the de Havilland Comet I service to South Africa; and the major developments then planned at London Airport, Heathrow (LHR)

The current near-saturation situation at airports such as LHR, needs a solution, alternative, or even amelioration, urgently. This could suggest that a major new seaplane design may be the way ahead; as this would create virtually zero environmental problems on the ground; marine terminal facilities adjacent to water, at nominal cost; and the obvious advantage of greater safety in terms of landing, and taking-off approaches, over water, as at say, La Guardia Airport, New York, or the Thames Estuary.

Any comments, please ?

[Reply]

Leave a Comment